|
|
|
On The
Hill ECBT Attends 2004 National Influenza Vaccine Summit California's Health Plans And Coalitions Spearhead Activities During Immunization Week Back to May 2004 NewsletterBack To Every Child By Two Main Page
|
On the Hill May 2004 Carol Ruppel (cruppel@ecbt.org) Congress is currently at an impasse in its fiscal year 2005 budget negotiations (budget resolution). The Senate is stalemated on the issue of whether to require offsets—lower spending in some areas and/or revenue increases--in order to accommodate any new tax cuts or spending increase. The budget resolution sets spending limits for the appropriations committees. Whether or not Congress can reach agreement on a final budget resolution, appropriators may send spending bills to the floor beginning on May 15. Senators Jeff Bingaman’s
(D-NM) and Gordon Smith’s (R-OR) Children’s Vaccine
Access Act
(S. 2272) has had a positive reception with Congressional staffers. The bill would allow state and local health
departments to administer vaccines allocated to the Vaccines for
Children (VFC)
program to privately-insured children who lack coverage for
immunization
services. VFC is an entitlement program,
and as such, is a guarantee to those who qualify. Currently
those “under-insured” children can
only receive vaccines through this program at federally-qualified and
rural
health centers, which can be inaccessible to many families. By expanding the sites where VFC vaccine is
offered, states would save on the vaccines they can purchase with 317
discretionary federal funding, which is limited. States
would be able to purchase vaccines for
other low-income populations with their federal (317) grant dollars. This bill is unlikely to move unless Members
of Congress hear from their constituents. There is some discussion about recommending
the use of
Hepatitis A vaccine to everyone. On
April 21, the Congressional Biomedical Research Caucus (a group of
Members of
Congress who share this interest) sponsored a briefing on Hepatitis A. Dr. David P. Greenberg, director of a vaccine
research center connected to the University of Pittsburgh School of
Medicine
and Children’s Facilitating the use of electronic rather
than paper medical
records has been high on the list of federal priorities in the last
month. As the Alliance for Health Reform,
the group
that is co-chaired by Senators Rockefeller (D-WV) and Frist (R-TN) to
inform
members of Congress on health care policy, reports “the health care
sector has
languished behind almost all other industries in adopting information
technology, which has the potential of vastly improving quality. For example, a variety of studies have found
that prescribing drugs through a system known as computer physician
order entry,
compared with a handwritten prescription, greatly reduces the incidence
of the
wrong medication being prescribed or the wrong dose dispensed.” At an President Bush mentioned the need to use
electronic systems
for medical records in this year’s State of the Union address,
connecting their
use to reductions in medical errors and medical costs.
On April 27 the president announced his
intention of establishing a nationwide electronic medical records
system within
10 years. For that purpose he’s created
the HHS Secretary Thompson held a summit earlier this month with health care industry and technology company leaders, physicians and others to discuss medical information technology. The National Health Information Technology office is to coordinate and evaluate current and future HHS Department information technology efforts and establish technical standards to allow physicians and hospitals to share electronic records. For those familiar with immunization registries, please note that HL 7 standards will be used in the expanded set of standards. (The Health Level 7 is a voluntary international health standards setting organization that has been adopted by many immunization registries.) |